Now, you know me. I don’t see it as my job patronise people. (Patronise, in this instance, means to treat folk condescendingly btw). I’m not one to say ‘I told you so’. I’m not the sort to bang on about how right I was all along but it is very nice to be proved correct by no less a body than the Institute of Advanced Motorists.
This organisation is one of the sensible voices in the motoring world and they have warned that car manufacturers are building high-tech distractions into their new vehicles and have made interiors so comfortable they are being turned into living rooms. This warning has come from IAM chief executive officer Sarah Sillars, who said efforts to reduce distraction factors for motorists are being undone by the relentless pace of technology and eagerness of car makers to pack more gadgets onto dashboards. This is something that DriveWrite has been on about for ages.
Sarah Sillars said that the main areas of concern were highly sophisticated satellite-navigation and GPS systems, smartphones that mirror tablets and easy connectivity of internet and social media. The IAM has suggested the UK should adopt guidelines suggested by the US Department of Transportation and National Highway Transportation Safety Administration (NHTSA).
They say drivers should be restricted from using certain non-essential forms of technology while the vehicle is in motion, and car makers should not introduce any technological development which takes the driver’s attention off the road for longer than two seconds. These voluntary guidelines are to be phased in over the next three years to address this large-scale problem in the USA.
US Federal data figures, say IAM, showed in 2011 that accidents involving a distracted driver killed 3,331 people and injured another 387,000. I’d say that that was fairly convincing.
And for younger drivers the problem is worse. Car accidents are the main cause of death of teenagers (as it is for all people aged between five and 34), and a quarter of all teen-driving crashes in the US are attributed to distracted driving).
Sarah said: “We cannot allow the same trends in the USA to happen here. While car makers work constantly to incorporate active and passive safety features into vehicles, making us safer than ever before, they are also guilty of making us too comfortable and making us feel more cosseted – like we were in our own living rooms.”
The IAM says as technology constantly changes, continued education campaigns are required to reinforce and update the current laws. Sarah concluded: “Technology could be a great way of helping to cut the numbers of people killed and seriously injured on our roads. It would be a tragedy if technology became a reason why more, rather than less, people lose their lives.”